+1 I agree. "Toolkit" sounds like exactly that - if Im not interested in learning how to use a new "tool" then I would never explore it. I would miss out on a wealth of research information and guidlines. Jacob
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Erin Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > As I was reorganizing the Fluid website, I was reminded of the > unintuitiveness(!) of the name "UX Toolkit". Some of the new members our > team were confused by the name as I was when I first heard it. > > General reactions were: > "What is UX?" > "Toolkit sounds like it's something technical. Something developers would > use." > "Toolkit for user experience. What could it be... Is it like diagrams?" > > If I was looking for information on say, "how to do user testing", I would > never think to click on something called "UX Toolkit". We have great stuff > in UX Toolkit, and I think it will be seen and used more if the name was > more intuitive, perhaps something like "Design Guidelines". > > What do others think? > > Erin > > _______________________________________________________ > fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, > see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work > -- Jacob Farber University of Toronto - ATRC Tel: (416) 946-3002 www.fluidproject.org
_______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
