That would be an interesting case, and seems to define in a way what
the Manual test should be. Tests which are not representable as unit
tests. If a page does not meet this criteria, maybe it should be moved
or remade as I mentioned in the previous e-mail.
Thanks
Justin
On 20-Mar-09, at 4:33 PM, Jacob Farber wrote:
So how would we deal with the CSS "tests"? Im not sure it would work
as a sample page.
From: [email protected] [[email protected]
] On Behalf Of Justin [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 4:24 PM
To: Fluid Work
Subject: Question about manual test pages
Hello,
There is a jira on bug parade about needing to re-evaluate the use
and need for manual test pages.
FLUID-2333:
Re-evaluate the need and use of manual tests
http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-2333
The main question here is, should the manual tests be included in
the release bundle?
It would seem that manual tests should be converted to unit tests,
where possible. If the manual test shows some important
functionality, maybe it should be promoted to a full fledged sample-
page.
Any thoughts?
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
