Hi Everett,

I agree, it is a good idea to have a url provided. It keeps track of and makes 
explicit where the issue was found. I think in this case, since this was filed 
during a bit of a testing sprint, that it was probably just missed when filling 
out the jira. Thanks for alerting us to this.

I believe the correct url for the Progress Component demo that was tested is  
http://build.fluidproject.org/infusion/demos/progress/html/progress.html 

I've cc'd Jan here so that he can confirm it, and made a comment on the jira 
itself as well.

Thanks
Justin

On 2010-08-11, at 6:05 AM, E.J. Zufelt wrote:

> Good morning,
> 
> I was taking a look at issues in JIRA this morning (a chore with a 
> screen-reader), and I came across a progress bar issue:
> 
> http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-3671
> 
> The comments on testing were useful, but there was no information, that I 
> could find, showing a URL for any example page where the testing was 
> performed.  This makes it quite difficult to retest and confirm the posted 
> results.
> 
> In this situation is it safe for me to assume that the problem is always 
> experienced with the progress component, regardless of implementation, or is 
> it likely that the information was just not posted to the JIRA?  Having a URL 
> provided for issues would be useful for future testing and troubleshooting.
> 
> Thanks,
> Everett Zufelt
> http://zufelt.ca
> 
> Follow me on Twitter
> http://twitter.com/ezufelt
> 
> View my LinkedIn Profile
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/ezufelt
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

Reply via email to