Maybe, but 1...8 is also ambiguous.. I actually think referring to the item indexes is simpler:
"Page 4 (Items 31 to 40)" Cheers, Jan -- (Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc. [email protected] | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 | fax: 416-977-9844 Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) | http://inclusivedesign.ca/ Faculty of Design | OCAD University From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James William Yoon Sent: November 19, 2010 9:59 AM To: Richards, Jan Cc: Colin Clark; Fluid Work Subject: Re: Demo branch is frozen Either way*, I mean. I should proofread my emails before clicking send! On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:58 AM, James William Yoon <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Richards, Jan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Pager: OK - could we somehow get "-" to read as "to"? This is something Erin and I have been chatting about as well. "To" would be great if the content is alphabetical, but isn't there potential ambiguity in the case where we're dealing with numeric content? e.g., "1 to 8" would be read out as "one two eight" Either day, I agree that it'd be an improvement over the dash/hyphen, which isn't read out at all. James
_______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
