I took a look over Harris and my changes, and none of them seem to have created 
any functions that should be marked as unsupported. Golam's changes to 
FLUID-3391 may be a different situation and you should probably check in with 
Antranig on this.

Thanks
Justin

On 2010-12-13, at 11:01 AM, Justin Obara wrote:

> Looked through progress, I don't think there is anything there that needs to 
> be marked as unsupported. I'll take a look a reorderer since harris isn't 
> here.
> 
> Thanks
> Justin
> On 2010-12-13, at 10:32 AM, Cheetham, Anastasia wrote:
> 
>> 
>> One of the remaining tasks before release is to identify any "public" 
>> functions/methods/instance variables/options that we don't actually want 
>> users to use, and comment to that effect in the code:
>>   http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-3881
>> 
>> I have some sense of different areas of the code in which these comments are 
>> needed, and I'll be pinging people about it once I've had a quick look over 
>> the code. Likely suspects:
>> 
>> Antranig: framework changes
>> Mike: Inline Edit (this isn't actually for 'unsupported' things, but 
>> descriptions of newly public functions that are supported)
>> Justin: Progress
>> Colin/Mike: Uploader
>> Harris: Reorderer
>> 
>> There may be more, I'll know once I check the code.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Anastasia Cheetham     Inclusive Design Research Centre
>> [email protected]            Inclusive Design Institute
>>                                       OCAD University
>> 
>> _______________________________________________________
>> fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
> 

_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

Reply via email to