I've pushed the qunit update to the master. https://github.com/fluid-project/infusion/commit/2dc794e96f6033e64cc407cfb7e659e3eaa16e58
You should see a commits e-mail about it. Thanks Justin On 2011-02-02, at 12:42 PM, Colin Clark wrote: > Hi Justin, > > Okay, so to summarize: > > 1. You've upgraded to the latest QUnit > 2. You've tested it against jQuery 1.4.2 (which we will ship with Infusion > 1.3.1) > > If it works and looks good, I say go for it. > > For those who are wondering about the newly minted jQuery 1.5, our plan is to > do a rough test with it for Infusion 1.3.1. Early adopters should be able to > pick it up and start developing with it right away. For those of us who are > more production-minded, we'll wait for jQuery 1.5.1 to be released and fully > qualify it across all our A-Grade browsers for Infusion 1.4. > > Colin > > On 2011-02-02, at 11:07 AM, Justin Obara wrote: > >> Now that jQuery 1.5 has been released to the wild, I thought it might be a >> good time to look at updating qunit. >> >> I've pulled down the latest code from their git repo ( >> https://github.com/jquery/qunit ) and tried it out in safari. All our tests >> were behaving as expected. You can try it for yourself by cloning my >> infusion repo for ( https://github.com/jobara/infusion ) and checking out >> the qunit-test branch. >> >> What I noticed was new: >> >> • Some changes to styling >> • Test names are visible all the time, then styled when run >> • The expected result is more clearly displayed >> • The hide all passed tests checkbox is back >> >> I think we should go ahead and upgrade to the latests qunit for 1.3.1. We >> could also wait till we upgrade to jquery 1.5. There's really no specific >> rush. Please let me know what you think. > > --- > Colin Clark > Technical Lead, Fluid Project > http://fluidproject.org > _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
