hey Colin and all, So FLUID-4061 ended up being a flag that the scrolling table is still in need of some polishing - absolutely positioned stuff inside the table isn't scrolling correctly because the scrollable isn't positioned relatively. More details in the issue. But the consensus with this crunch to freeze is that we should play it safe, save the scrollable table feature for 1.4, and revert back to the not as awesome, but functional mark-up for uploader.
I've started this change here https://github.com/heidiv/infusion/commits/FLUID-4061 Colin, I had trouble getting the scrollTo stuff to work again... I think the IOC changes in FileQueuView.js aren't quite right. Help? heidi On 2011-02-15, at 11:07 AM, Colin Clark wrote: > Hi Heidi, > > Seems like this is a bug stemming from our fix to FLUID-3837, which was a > blocker for 1.3.1. Given that, I've also filed FLUID-4061 as a blocker for > the release. Fix away! > > Was there another bug related to this issue as well? > > Colin > > On 2011-02-15, at 9:52 AM, Valles, Heidi wrote: > >> hey guys, >> >> I'm working on this one today: >> http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-4061 >> >> be nice to get into 1.3.1 >> >> h. >> >> >> On 2011-02-14, at 5:01 PM, Colin Clark wrote: >> >>> Hey Michelle, >>> >>> Here's a quick status update on a few of these items... >>> >>> On 2011-02-10, at 10:45 AM, Michelle D'Souza wrote: >>> >>>> 1. Should we ship the changes to get/set that went in with svn revision >>>> 10469 even though we will not be doing a full QA cycle? >>>> Justin and Antranig are planning to talk about this. >>> >>> We're going to pull this from master before shipping Infusion 1.3.1 in >>> order to reduce QA time. We'll include it in 1.4 instead. >>> >>>> 2. Should we fork jslint so we can keep our 'var in for' style or should >>>> we change our style? >>>> Antranig has offered to do the fork and pull request . >>> >>> Antranig, Justin and I chatted this afternoon. Antranig's planning to hack >>> on this tonight. We'll need to work with Jamon to get this deployed >>> somewhere until Crockford updates jslint.com, or else ask coders to run it >>> locally. >>> >>>> 3. Should we ship 4055 (IoC changes) in 1.3.1 or 1.4? >>>> My personal thoughts are that we put these changes in 1.4 but I'd like >>>> to know what Antranig thinks. >>> >>> Nothing has been committed for FLUID-4055 yet, so we'll punt it to Infusion >>> 1.4. >>> >>>> FLUID-3886 - The strategy for fixing this was worked out in the channel. >>>> Either Colin or I will attempt to get this work done and into 1.3.1 but it >>>> hasn't been started yet. >>> >>> I'll start in on this one now. >>> >>>> FLUID-3900 - Mike has started this work and has a patch which could be >>>> picked up by someone else >>> >>> I can work on this one tomorrow. > > --- > Colin Clark > Technical Lead, Fluid Project > http://fluidproject.org > _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
