On 2011-09-21, at 1:00 AM, Antranig Basman wrote: > On 20/09/2011 14:37, Cheetham, Anastasia wrote: >> >> My question is this: Is this something we want to let integrators know >> about? Or do we actually want to prevent them from realizing that these >> functions technically implemented this way? >> > > Hi AC - I would soft-pedal the lifecycle functions somewhat, ... So I would > not go overboard in delving into the implementation details in the > explanation. You can just refer the reader to the standard documentation on > events for these details (which will, in contrast, remain stable).
Ok, will do. Thanks. > On a related note, we probably want to highly encourage users to supply > namespaces for standard listeners… Good to know! I'll look into updating the event system docs (and any other relevant docs) to reinforce this. Thanks! -- Anastasia Cheetham Inclusive Design Research Centre [email protected] Inclusive Design Institute OCAD University _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
