Justin,
While I do understand his point, on the broader scheme -- being negative hovers
(for which I agree) -- where I have issues is the underlining link text being
"obtrusive." I have problems with that. Not aesthetically (they are somewhat
unflattering looking), rather functionally. It's not regular text. It's a link.
And does something different than regular text. It goes somewhere else. And
changing a links colour isn't enough in my mind. Another cue is needed. An
underline is brilliant. Is that not the point?
I don't know. Of course it's a preference. A preference I believe that is
benefitted by the underline. And not the default link underline, but the
removed underline and the added border on the bottom of a link. I think that
solves the reading issue (as best as possible), as a border is set lower than a
link underline, less opportunity for the underline to meddle (visually) with
the word. And given that fact wouldn't it help with a persons access to the
content?
Just some more of my thoughts...
Johnny
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
