Hi all, On the subject of review-before-push, I find myself curiously quiet.
I am interested in the idea that, as Justin points out, this new proposal might serve as a bit of an equalizer. Regardless of being a contributor or a formal committer, we all go through the same general workflow. Code in a personal repository, make a pull request for inclusion into the project repository, and get reviewed by a peer. At the same time, I also see the argument about resources. Can we scale the review process to a point where it can be done in a timely manner for each new change to Infusion? Any reason not to just try it and find out? On 2011-11-13, at 1:27 AM, Antranig Basman wrote: > That said, I am extremely excited for us to move to the 100% review model, > assuming we can actually make it work economically - in the interests of > testing this out, I am putting this FLUID-4525 branch up for pull + review in > order to see what happens to it :) I'll take this review task on. It looks like a worthwhile set of changes. Colin --- Colin Clark Technical Lead, Fluid Project http://fluidproject.org _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
