On 2012-01-23, at 7:35 AM, Justin Obara wrote: > Although it doesn't look like something that someone would have used, we > can't be certain that any of our users haven't. Since we've tried to provide > backwards compatibility for all our point releases, I think we should > deprecate and continue to support the old name.
I agree with Justin on this one: Maintain backwards compatibility. Create a stub for the old name and mark it as deprecated. If for some reason we decide not to maintain backwards compatibility, we should at the very least email the infusion-users list and let users know about the change (in case some are updating from "trunk"). -- Anastasia Cheetham Inclusive Design Research Centre [email protected] Inclusive Design Institute OCAD University _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
