Long ago (perhaps even as early as 2006) we embarked on an XUnit-style wrapper for the QUnit testing framework which has since come to be managed by the jQuery community. At the time, this was on the basis of increased familiarity by Java and C++ developers with the XUnit-style - for better or worse, we have accumulated a huge codebase of tests expressed in this style, as well as a number of utilities which we find useful in our community (for example, for comparing trees of Fluid Renderer components).

As part of the rationalisation work required by http://issues.gpii.net/browse/GPII-77 and http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-4886 it was found to simplify the code loading idiom considerably of our jqUnit and associated platform support libraries in the browser and node.js environments to give it a dependence on our core framework file Fluid.js. Over the years, the position of jqUnit has become progressively clearer as something we could not expect to reasonably offer or support to groups outside the Fluid community - but I am sending this mail to check on consensus for this point - the pull requests in question are under review now, and so this de facto decision could be reversed if we decided that we really wanted to prepare and support jqUnit as something of wider interest outside Fluid.

Cheers,
Antranig
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

Reply via email to