Thanks Michelle for bringing this up, my comments on are inline below. Thanks Justin On 2013-07-26, at 2:41 PM, Michelle D'Souza <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi everyone, > > I was doing some testing and noticed that we once again have some broken > integration demos in the project repository master. I'm wondering if we want > to fix them or if we want to remove them. > > Demo of what UIO looks like in an old version of Sakai: > http://build.fluidproject.org/infusion/integration-demos/sakai/html/ui-options-fss-sakai.html > My preference is to remove this, since we have UIO integrated in several > production spaces at this point, and this demo doesn't show anything > different for the real world cases. +1 > > Demo of Pager in an old version of Sakai: > http://build.fluidproject.org/infusion/integration-demos/sakai/html/pager-site-setting.html > My preference is to remove this since the Pager demo shows basically the same > use case. +1 > > Manual test of Progress: > http://build.fluidproject.org/infusion/tests/manual-tests/html/simple-progress.html > I think we should fix this one since it shows more than our demo does. Would it be possible to convert this manual tests into expand coverage in our unit tests? > > Please chime in if you have an opinion. > > Michelle > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Michelle D'Souza > Senior Inclusive Developer > Inclusive Design Research Centre, OCAD University > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, > see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
