HI Alexander,

I replied to you the following day in the IRC channel, but perhaps you weren't 
actually there or didn't see it. At any rate, it's good to get this on the 
mailing list.

For the time being, you'll want to stick with a single template. Cindy and I 
will work on making a new panel combining panel or something of that sort which 
will allow you to assemble many panels into one. You can see more about this on 
http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-5131 . There are a couple of 
comments linking to IRC discussions with Antranig about it. 

Cindy and I plan to start working on it today. Let us know if you have any 
questions about it.

Thanks
Justin

On 2013-09-16, at 4:28 AM, Alexander Milchev <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Hi Justin,
> 
> We last discussed this issue in the IRC channel and as far as I remember, 
> never reached a conclusion.
> I know it's a rather complex one, please let me know what is its current 
> state anytime soon.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alexander
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Justin Obara <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> 
> I think you should be able to use the style I mentioned, but you have to use 
> the expanded form.
> 
> So something like this should work.
> 
>         resources: {
>             keyEcho: {
>                 url: 
> "../../src/shared/adjusters/html/speakTextTemplate-keyEcho.html"
>             }
>         }
> 
> Also you don't seem to need the setTimeout for the call to finishInit now. 
> The markup does seem to be appended correctly for me. Although it could be in 
> the wrong place. You'll also need to instantiate the component that uses this 
> markup, after it has been appended to the DOM.
> 
> Hope that helps.
> Justin
> 
> On 2013-09-09, at 8:57 AM, Alexander Milchev <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Justin,
>> 
>> Thank you for the suggestion! Here are some conclusions I came across while 
>> trying to configure it.
>> 
>> My desire was to omit the keyEcho part in the collective template and 
>> instead load its html markup using resources and container.append().
>> By the way here any name other than "template:" would result in an Uncaught 
>> TypeError. When trying to load it with fluid.fetchResources the way you 
>> suggested, the panel's container is just doubled - apparently 
>> that.options.resources.template.resourceText represents the current (big) 
>> html container. This could also be seen by checking this hook in the console.
>> Appending the keyEcho html section this ugly way is successful, but it is 
>> never actually shown and rendered. Perhaps it's a timig issue.
>> 
>> You could checkout this branch in my repo and have a better look at it.
>> Let me know if there is any progress!
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Alexander
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Justin Obara <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Alexander,
>> 
>> You may have come upon another limitation, but perhaps there is a way 
>> around. The templates block in the options can take in multiple resources 
>> e.g.
>> 
>> resources: {
>>      keyEchoTemplate: {},
>>      wordEchoTemplate: {}
>> }
>> 
>> Although I'm not sure how this is handled by the renderer. So you'll have to 
>> try it out and see how things go. 
>> 
>> It seems that my example worked because the templates were already combined. 
>> If the above suggestion doesn't work, you could manually insert the fetched 
>> templates into the DOM, which should allow the renderer to see it. In the 
>> above example you would find the template markup at 
>> "that.options.resources.keyEchoTemplate.resourceText" and 
>> "that.options.resources.wordEchoTemplate.resourcetext". You can insert it 
>> into the DOM with something like jQuery's append.
>> 
>> You can see something similar from UIO.
>> https://github.com/fluid-project/infusion/blob/master/src/components/uiOptions/js/UIOptions.js#L416
>> 
>> However, that being said you might run into issues with the auxiliary 
>> schema, as it's probably not setup to accept multiple templates for a single 
>> component.
>> 
>> Let me know if you have any more thoughts and/or expectations for how you'd 
>> like this to all work.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Justin
>> 
>> On 2013-09-02, at 8:45 AM, Alexander Milchev <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Anastasia,
>>> 
>>> Thank you for the reply, but I'm afraid you got me wrong. Perhaps I should 
>>> explain myself better.
>>> 
>>> My ambition is to break a bigger panel so that each piece has its own 
>>> template.
>>> The question is relevant to the grade merging, discussed previously in this 
>>> thread. I've been working on the Speak Text adjuster group and I tried to 
>>> merge these two panels into this big one, as Justin suggested. The 
>>> important part of the auxSchema is that both adjusters' panels' type is the 
>>> big panel (keyEcho, wordEcho) and all this information is overwritten by 
>>> the last defined, so these selectors are looked for in this template, 
>>> instead of the appropriate one.
>>> 
>>> Is there an elegant way to work around this?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alexander
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Chris Petsos <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi Alexander,
>>> 
>>> I don't know if this is what you need, but in my version of PMT the "big 
>>> panel" is here and all the "sub-panels" are here (e.g. magnifier-follows, 
>>> magnifier-position etc.) separate from each other. This is something that 
>>> is supported out-of-the-box in UIO. You'll get a feeling of how it's being 
>>> done if you browse the code a bit. Feel free to ask if you have any 
>>> questions. I don't know if some specialized grade merging is needed for 
>>> that; or are you trying to perform something more sophisticated?
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Chris.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 09/02/2013 03:26 PM, Alexander Milchev wrote:
>>>> Hi Anastasia,
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you for the reply, but I'm afraid you got me wrong. Perhaps I should 
>>>> have explained myself better.
>>>> 
>>>> My ambition is to break a bigger panel so that each piece has its own 
>>>> template. 
>>>> The question is relevant to the grade merging, discussed previously in 
>>>> this thread. I've been working on the Speak Text adjuster group and I 
>>>> tried to merge these two panels into this big one, as Justin suggested. 
>>>> The important part of the auxSchema is that both adjusters' panels' type 
>>>> is the big panel (keyEcho, wordEcho) and all this information is 
>>>> overwritten by the last defined, so these selectors are looked for in this 
>>>> template, instead of the appropriate one.
>>>> 
>>>> Is there an elegant way to work around this?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Alexander
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Cheetham, Anastasia <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 2013-08-30, at 9:43 AM, Alexander Milchev wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> > Hi everyone,
>>>> >
>>>> > I tried out the grade merging today and a question popped up.
>>>> >
>>>> > It seemed to me that no more than one html template could be shared 
>>>> > between multiple users of the same panel. This would be the template of 
>>>> > the adjuster, defined last in the auxSchema. For instance (in Justin's 
>>>> > example), if the auxSchema relates the big panel 
>>>> > "fluid.uiOptions.panels.linksControls" to both emphasizeLinks and 
>>>> > imputsLarger adjusters and imputsLarger is defined second, then info for 
>>>> > template, container and message for emphasizeLinks is neglected and 
>>>> > overwritten by those of imputsLarger.
>>>> >
>>>> > Does this mean that all templates must be stuffed in one big html file 
>>>> > (hope it doesn't) and how can the templates be apportioned properly?
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Alexander
>>>> 
>>>> Hi, Alexander,
>>>> 
>>>> It's possible I'm not quite understanding your question, and if so, please 
>>>> forgive me. But it is certainly possible for each panel to have its own 
>>>> template.
>>>> 
>>>> The auxiliary schema for the starter panels shows how this is done:
>>>> https://github.com/fluid-project/infusion/blob/master/src/components/uiOptions/js/StarterSchemas.js
>>>> 
>>>> The root part of the schema defines the template that will contain all of 
>>>> the panels:
>>>> https://github.com/fluid-project/infusion/blob/master/src/components/uiOptions/js/StarterSchemas.js#L34
>>>> This template contains an empty div for each panel.
>>>> 
>>>> The root part of the schema also defines a root directory for the 
>>>> individual panels:
>>>> https://github.com/fluid-project/infusion/blob/master/src/components/uiOptions/js/StarterSchemas.js#L33
>>>> 
>>>> Each of the panel blocks specifies its own template relative to the root 
>>>> directory:
>>>> https://github.com/fluid-project/infusion/blob/master/src/components/uiOptions/js/StarterSchemas.js#L45
>>>> https://github.com/fluid-project/infusion/blob/master/src/components/uiOptions/js/StarterSchemas.js#L66
>>>> https://github.com/fluid-project/infusion/blob/master/src/components/uiOptions/js/StarterSchemas.js#L87
>>>> etc.
>>>> 
>>>> (It isn't necessary to use the root directory prefix, that's just 
>>>> something you can use if it's helpful.)
>>>> 
>>>> Alexander, does this answer your question, or am I confused?
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Anastasia Cheetham     Inclusive Design Research Centre
>>>> [email protected]           Inclusive Design Institute
>>>>                                         OCAD University
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The information in this e-mail and any accompanying files is intended only 
>>>> for the recipients named above. This message may contain CONFIDENTIAL 
>>>> INFORMATION THAT IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not an intended 
>>>> recipient, you may not download, copy, disseminate, distribute or use in 
>>>> any way the information in this e-mail. Any of these actions can be a 
>>>> criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify 
>>>> Astea Solutions AD immediately by reply e-mail, and delete this e-mail and 
>>>> any copies of it.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.gpii.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The information in this e-mail and any accompanying files is intended only 
>>> for the recipients named above. This message may contain CONFIDENTIAL 
>>> INFORMATION THAT IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not an intended 
>>> recipient, you may not download, copy, disseminate, distribute or use in 
>>> any way the information in this e-mail. Any of these actions can be a 
>>> criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify 
>>> Astea Solutions AD immediately by reply e-mail, and delete this e-mail and 
>>> any copies of it.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Architecture mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.gpii.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The information in this e-mail and any accompanying files is intended only 
>> for the recipients named above. This message may contain CONFIDENTIAL 
>> INFORMATION THAT IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not an intended 
>> recipient, you may not download, copy, disseminate, distribute or use in any 
>> way the information in this e-mail. Any of these actions can be a criminal 
>> offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify Astea 
>> Solutions AD immediately by reply e-mail, and delete this e-mail and any 
>> copies of it.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Alexander Milchev
> Entry Level Software Engineer
> Astea Solutions AD
> 
> The information in this e-mail and any accompanying files is intended only 
> for the recipients named above. This message may contain CONFIDENTIAL 
> INFORMATION THAT IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not an intended recipient, 
> you may not download, copy, disseminate, distribute or use in any way the 
> information in this e-mail. Any of these actions can be a criminal offense. 
> If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify Astea Solutions AD 
> immediately by reply e-mail, and delete this e-mail and any copies of it.

_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

Reply via email to