I think we should make this change. It was suggested on list a while ago and it got a +1. http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/fluid-work/2014-January/009261.html
Lazy consensus says go for it. :) Michelle On 2014-03-07, at 1:00 PM, Justin Obara <[email protected]> wrote: > For several years, we've been hosting a forked version of the > http://jslint.com at http://swarm.fluidproject.org/jslint/ . We did this so > that we could remove some of the more aggressive linting requirements while > maintaining our high code quality standards. Recently our swarm server was > taken down, and along went our forked version of JSLint. However, in the time > since we put up our version of JSLint, JSHint has grown quite a bit and can > even be run as a node module. Perhaps now is the time to make the switch to > JSHint. > > If we do make the switch we'll need to update our lint comments in each JS > file and should consider adding JSHint to our grunt build scripts. > > Please let me know what you think. > > Thanks > Justin > _______________________________________________________ > fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, > see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
_______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
