While I'd like to maintain backwards compatibility in a point release, I feel 
that the security of our users takes precedence. We should make sure to add a 
note to the release notes for Infusion 1.5 about why Flash support for the 
uploader was removed.

+1

Justin

On May 1, 2014, at 9:46 AM, Clark, Colin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> I have discovered that SWFUpload, the Flash-based backend that we use for the 
> Uploader on legacy (i.e. old Internet Explorer) browsers, has an unpatched 
> cross-site scripting vulnerability. I’ve filed a JIRA ticket about this issue 
> here:
> 
> http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-5354
> 
> SWFUpload has, sadly, always represented some of the worst and most brittle 
> code we’ve encountered. Replacing it is costly, and time are changing. Our 
> plan for post-1.5 has been to drop support for legacy (i.e. non latest 
> version) browsers. This would have involved removing Flash support in the 
> Uploader anyway.
> 
> Given the severity of this issue, I am proposing that we go ahead and drop 
> Flash support from the Uploader in the Infusion 1.5 release. On legacy 
> browsers such as IE 8 and 9, the simple file uploader will be delivered 
> instead. Modern browsers will get the feature-rich HTML5 version.
> 
> Colin
> 
> ---
> Colin Clark
> Lead Software Architect,
> Inclusive Design Research Centre, OCAD University
> http://inclusivedesign.ca
> 
> _______________________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

Reply via email to