Thanks, Todd. Shall we add a small feature you mentioned here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00494.html this will help a lot for private sites need login.
Regards, Du Song On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:40, Todd Ditchendorf <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:03 PM, elspub <[email protected]> wrote: >> Seems solid so far. I've had 0 stability or performance bugs. >> A couple small bugs/issues; >> 1. the twitter toolbar icon is replaced with a browsabrowsa icon in >> menubar mode. > > i proably won't implement that due to lazyness. :| > >> 2. in normal mode, I can't change the appearance from Default(gray) to >> anything else. Well, I can change the setting, but nothing happens. > > unfortnately all my custom window designs are broken when you build > the app for 64 bit. so i turned that stuff off on SnowLeopard. i > should prolly also remove the option to change it. > > sorry, but that's what i get for using private apis. :( > >> 3. If you make a new fluid app with default icon, and then try and >> change the icon later via the preferences, you can choose your new >> icon (tried with both .icns and .png) but nothing changes. You can set >> a custom icon when you make the app. > > that's a serious problem. thx i'll look into it. > >> 4. The twitter plugin has some new appearance options. Some of which >> are great. I can't tell if I'm missing something or if there's just >> redundant options. But I can't tell the difference between "Hud panel" >> and "Floating HUD panel" and also "Utility panel" and "Floating >> Utility Panel" .... Also: it'd be great to get these appearance >> options for browsabrowsa. > > those actually are not new... the Thumbnail plugin has had these > options. actually i dont remember why i disabled them for the browsa > plugin... > > the "floating" option forces the panel to float above all other > windows in the app. the other option has normal window behavior. > > >> 5. Is the twitter plugin just a CSS sheet and some Javascript on >> twitter.com? I can't help but wonder if Hahlo would be better... > > Yes, much of the UI of the Twitter plugin is implemented as a WebKit > webview (just like in safari or fluid app SSBs). although all ofthe > logic is in native Objective-C, not JavaScript. > > i have *long* used Hahlo in a Browsa plugin, and it's a nice option. > however, ultimately, i felt it was not as good as an experience as it > could be if i wrote this plugin. Personally, i'm liking the twitter > plugin better than Hahlo in a browsa plugin, but you always have that > option available if you like. > >> Great work. > > thanks elspub! and thanks for the detailed report. helps a lot. > > td > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "fluidapp" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/fluidapp?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "fluidapp" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluidapp?hl=en.
