On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Christian Gruber <[email protected]> wrote: > Come to think of it, Chrome uses webkit and maintains a separate set > of cookies in its "incognito" mode. Now it doesn't write those > cookies, so that may be the issue, but perhaps there's some ideas > there that can be harvested for this purpose.
looking at the Chrome source for ideas is not a bad idea at all. in fact, it's a great idea. ultimately tho, unless it's a drop in replacement, I'm not willing to do that at this point for all the security reasons i mentioned in the other thread. > > Frankly, I'd be ok with having no cookies stored between sessions > (have to log in again when I re-open the fluid app) as long as it > wouldn't log me out in the middle of the session based on another > application's activity. :) interesting, but i just want to clarify that this would not get around all of the security issues/implications that have kept me from tackling this. it's not just the persistant storage of cookies on disk, but also the touching/altering/handling every cookie that comes thru the browser. again, way too much privacy/security risk for me to want to do this. TD -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "fluidapp" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluidapp?hl=en.
