[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13186737#comment-13186737
 ] 

E. Sammer commented on FLUME-931:
---------------------------------

I haven't yet looked at the patch, but the tail source in 0.9.x was the bane of 
everyone's existence. It's much harder than it sounds (e.g. we need to do 
things like track inodes in order to catch when files are rotated which is 
difficult in java without JNI) and I'm extremely disinclined to re-include any 
tail functionality unless those issues are resolved. Absolutely any ports of 
the original, very problematic code aren't going to be a welcome addition to 
1.x. All of that said, I'll try and take a look at the code and give it a fair 
shake, but if it is simply the same thing from 0.9.x (albeit cleaned up) then 
there's (almost) no advantage over exec source with tail -F.
                
> Flume NG TailSource
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: FLUME-931
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-931
>             Project: Flume
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Sinks+Sources
>            Reporter: Juhani Connolly
>             Fix For: v1.1.0
>
>         Attachments: flume-931.patch, flume-tail.patch
>
>
> Flume NG currently doesn't have a TailSource as existed in OG

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to