Hi Ralph, On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > After more than 72 hours this vote is now closed. It has failed to generate > more binding +1's than negative +1s with at least 3 +1 votes. > > +1 > Ralph (binding) > Alex > Juhani > > -1 > Arvind (binding) > Jarcec > Mike > Prasad > Hari > > In short, there were only 2 PPMC members interested in this topic. I would > also point out that 4 of the 5 -1 votes work for the same employer. These > two facts concern me and make me wonder if the project is really ready for > graduation.
A couple of more facts to keep things in perspective: there is one +1 vote from Alex, who works for the same employer. Secondly - previous policy vote that was called by me also failed to gather support, with -1 votes coming from folks working for the same employer [1], one of which was a PPMC vote. [1] http://incubator.markmail.org/thread/uzmzcvwr5ezbsrjy I therefore do not share the concern that you have regarding diversity (and implied integrity), but to be doubly sure that we are doing what is right by the community, I am happy to wait until we have more representation in committers and PPMC from other employers. I was planning on starting the graduation proceedings right after the 1.1.0 release but will put that on hold until we have everyone on board with the idea of graduation. Thanks, Arvind Prabhakar > > Ralph > > > On Mar 19, 2012, at 12:10 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> I would like to propose that Flume adopt the release numbering scheme >> followed by Apache Commons which can be found at >> http://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html#Release_Numbers. >> >> Please vote >> >> [] +1 Yes - Flume should adopt this policy >> [] +0 Abstain - I don't have a preference >> [] -1 No - Flume should adopt some other policy >> >> Ralph >
