+1 on Concordion -- Alexander Lorenz http://mapredit.blogspot.com German Hadoop LinkedIn Group: http://goo.gl/N8pCF
On May 3, 2012, at 7:33 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > As long as you don't distribute it or require users to run it in order > to run your code I think it's fine. > > That said would be nice to be using asl software, have you looked at > http://www.concordion.org/ ? > > Patrick > > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Build tools that are not distributed by the ASF are fine to use. >> >> Ralph >> >> On May 2, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: >> >>> (Picking up an old thread that got buried in my inbox) >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Brock Noland <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Arvind Prabhakar <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> In the past I have used the FIT framework successfully to do integration >>>>> testing. It has a bit of a steep starting cost, but once the fixtures are >>>>> developed and a few tests written, it becomes very easy to extend and >>>>> maintain. >>>>> >>>>> http://fit.c2.com/ >>>> >>>> I will check this out, it's GPL, I assume that should be fine? >>>> >>> >>> I do know that some projects use asciidoc which is GPL licensed. As long as >>> it is being used at build time and not being packaged with the system, it >>> should be fine I think. >>> >>> (Mentors: please chime in with your input on this). >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The other alternative is to use TestNG/JUnit categorized for integration >>>>> test where you create the various processes in a controlled environment >>>>> etc. This approach is a bit more tedious and harder to maintain, although >>>>> easer to start with. >>>> >>>> Yeah JUnit as integration testing is OK but not great IMHO. >>>> >>>> Which module should the tests go in? >>>> >>> >>> I think it would make sense to have them in the flume-ng-dist module if not >>> in a module of its own. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Arvind >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Brock >>>> >>
