Hi Ralph, 
Yep, I'll get the keys taken care of as well as get the docs updated and the 
artifacts published to central.

Regards,
Mike


On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:

> Mike,
> 
> I previously mentioned that you need a signed key to do the release. Did you 
> take care of that?
> 
> Also, I mentioned that the release instructions should be updated to make 
> sure the artifacts are released to the Nexus repository - Do you know how to 
> do that?
> 
> Ralph
> 
> 
> On Jun 27, 2012, at 3:50 PM, Mike Percy wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > This is a friendly reminder that I plan on cutting branch-1.2.0 this Friday
> > (in 2 days)!
> > 
> > After the branch is cut, the plan is to only accept critical application
> > bug fixes, build fixes, and documentation updates until release. This is to
> > ensure as stable a 1.2.0 release as possible. So if you want something in
> > for 1.2.0, please submit your patches now.
> > 
> > Looking forward to our first official release as an Apache TLP!
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Mike
> > 
> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Mike Percy wrote:
> > 
> > > Thanks everyone for your votes and responses! Here's what I'd like to do
> > > for the release schedule:
> > > 
> > > - Friday, June 29: cut release branch
> > > - Rel. Mgr. to backport critical bugfix/build/doc changes between branch
> > > and release
> > > - Monday, July 9: begin release vote
> > > 
> > > Note that this a bit more conservative than the 2-3 week release schedule
> > > I originally mentioned (but not by much). As suggested, I've marked the
> > > wishlist items through JIRA as Blocker tickets. However, since these JIRAs
> > > are in varying stages of completion, I propose that anything that misses
> > > the deadline will need to be pushed to the next release (even if it's
> > > marked as a Blocker).
> > > 
> > > Here is a JIRA link to the list of v1.2.0 Blocker tickets:
> > > http://s.apache.org/1eH
> > > 
> > > Please raise any issues or concerns right away. Here's to putting out a
> > > great 1.2.0 release!
> > > 
> > > Best,
> > > Mike
> > > 
> > > 
> > > PS: These were the wishlist items I saw that were raised in the discuss
> > > thread:
> > > - Cannot start agent a 3rd time when using FileChannel <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1232>
> > > - Remove the org.apache.hadoop.io (http://org.apache.hadoop.io).*
> > > dependencies from FileChannel and ResumableMemoryChannel <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1285>
> > > - Add more unit tests for HBase sink <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1204>
> > > - Create metric collection infrastructure <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-748>
> > > - Support external tooling in configuration system <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1051>
> > > - Flume hot-reconfiguration specification <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1278>
> > > - OutOfMemory errors in Flume build <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1256>
> > > - FileChannel hangs silently when Hadoop libs not found <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1246>
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Mike Percy wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Developers,
> > > > It has been nearly 3 months since we released Flume 1.1.0. Since the
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 1.1.0 release, we have had 117 commits to the trunk, and 114 JIRAs have
> > > been marked "Resolved Fixed" with a target of v1.2.0. This flurry of
> > > activity represents a whole slew of new features and a bunch of bug fixes.
> > > > 
> > > > Because of the above, I think we should release a Flume 1.2.0 to the
> > > world within 2-3 weeks. I propose that I be the release manager for this
> > > release. To that end, I would like to cut an SVN branch pretty soon to
> > > stabilize and test the code in advance of the release.
> > > > 
> > > > In addition, I'd like to gather input on what other devs would like to
> > > see included in a 1.2.0 release.
> > > > 
> > > > Aside from a few JIRAs already marked as Patch Available, the one thing
> > > I'd really like to make happen is a once-over on the user guide to cover
> > > the latest features. I'm willing to help.
> > > > 
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Mike
> > > 
> > 
> 



Reply via email to