Ken, I think your post may confuse people who don't see the long blocks of HTML and geek code that you do. I believe you're referring to Heiko Recktenwald's post titled "Doors of Perception. Court Rules (fwd)" Which contains an attachment. I see the attachment, but I don't see the code you refer to. I don't know what mail reader you're using, but most email progs will interpret this code as an attachment. I have no opinion on the ethics of attachments on this lists. nick --this has been a fluxus performance titled "geek code prt. 2 act. 23"-- > -----Original Message----- > From: Ken Friedman [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 30 March 2000 17:55 > To: Fluxlist > Subject: FLUXLIST: No long posts filled HTML and geek code, please > > Is there some reason why posts are filled with long blocks of HTML and > geek > code ? > Can't we just get plain vanilla text messages in ascii ? > > Pleaaaaaaaaaaase ... be careful with drfault settings and with forwards > from the web. > This stuff is a pain in the eye, and it clutters up the list. > > Ken >
RE: FLUXLIST: No long posts filled HTML and geek code, please
Potter, Nick (Worley - Spotswood) Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:37:54 -0800
- FLUXLIST: No long posts filled HTML and ... Ken Friedman
- Re: FLUXLIST: No long posts filled ... Heiko Recktenwald
- RE: FLUXLIST: No long posts filled ... Potter, Nick (Worley - Spotswood)
- RE: FLUXLIST: No long posts fil... narvis & ...pez

