>Fluxlist and Ken: (from Don)
>Sorry about leaving out the attribution, Ken,
>but my previous posts referred Roger to you
>and said, "Why not use Ken's 12 ideas and get his
>permission first." Thus the attribution was
>already made but not in my final text, which
>I assumed Roger would do in his final printing.


which, of course, I had planned to do

however

it has become clear to me that the whole thing about defining Fluxus
is much too difficult to do in one short paragraph

so I'm copping out here
(an English expression meaning ducking the responsibility)

as it is a book of poems
rather than a treatise about art

so

I'm going to include an appendix
which gives Sol's definition of Fluxlist
with a note that if anyone wants to know more
about Fluxus - they can join Fluxlist...

Hope this is okay!

But I would like to thank Don, Ken and Owen for their work
and help with this tricky subject.
As always, very much appreciated.


Roger




Reply via email to