i think that a many of the pieces show fluxus sensibilities, and they are
from "notFluxus" people
i like the apparent 'simplicity' of the stuff i recieved
there are things that are obvious in what they are, things that sort of,
after a while, you can work out, and things that are
beautiful/interesting/confusing in their own right and that sort of defy
banal "explanation"
i know that i will probably be scorned for this, but, a lot of the time i
dont study works or take a great deal of interest in the academic dissection
of ideas; there are works that i see and think "so?", those that make me go
"oh!" and those that make me go "Hmmmmmmmmmmm"
all of which i gain from in some way
i don't think that there is much to be gained from discussing the
"fluxusness" of the contents of the box, it is not after all a "FluXuS"
box, it is a co(o)lection of works by people with a similar interest, and a
relatively successful one at that.
let's discuss this
p.s. sol, as one who has a severe weakness for the grape and the grain, i
think you'll find it's "Flurrsstiitishz"
(hee hee "hic" oO�)
sol! sol! the wine's still cheap! you still coming?
alan
