1
2
3 unsu*scribe
4 unsu*scribe
5
6
7
8
9 unsu*scribe
10
11 unsubscribe
12 unsubscribe
13 unsubscribe
14 unsubscribe
15 unsubscribe

bah /\buns\w*b/i

>       # administrivia      [bool] (yes) <resend>
>       # Look for administrative requests (e.g. subscribe/unsubscribe) and
>       # forward them to the list maintainer instead of the list.
>administrivia     =   yes




you wrote:
>FYI, I recieved this email 4 freakin times, so if
>you are being censored its probably majordomo
>built in defenses against spam.
>
>Eric Andersen wrote:
>
>>  This mail was sent to Fluxlist, Ken Friedman and me some hours ago.
>>
>>  Why hasn't it appeared on the list???
>>
>>  Ciao
>>  Eric
>>
>>  ##################################
>>
>>  High!
>>
>>  >Actually Ken has unsubscribed from Fluxlist.
>>
>>  IPUT recalls the process:
>>
>>  1.
>>
>>  On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Ken Friedman wrote:
>>
>>  (...)
>>  > Internet petitions do not work.
>>  (...)
>>  -------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>  2.
>>
>>  Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 19:42:04 +0200
>>  From: "St.Auby Tamas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  To: Fluxlist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: Internet petitions do not work
>>
>>  High!
>>
>>  On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Ken Friedman wrote:
>>
>>  > Internet petitions do not work.
>>
>>  Eric Andersen - after extensive research -
>>  have informed me that
>>  it was the internet petition more than anything else
>>  that made the bureaucrats in Sao Paulo Bienal
>>  realise the consequences, and
>>  reconsider their decision concerning Ivo Mesquita.
>>
>>  Hugh!
>>
>>  aa
>>  -------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>  3.
>>
>>  (>Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 07:47:58 +0200
>>  >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  >From: Ken Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  >Subject: Offlist note)
>>
>>  (...)
>>  >many of Eric's claims are also sheer fabrications and lies
>>  (...)
>>   ---------------
>>
>>  4.
>>
>>          Since IPUT doesn't believe in the notion of private,
>>          recieving the above "offlist note" by Ken Friedman
>>          IPUT have forwarded it to Eric Andersen.
>>   ---------------
>>
>>  5.
>>
>>  Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 15:24:10 -0400
>>  From: Eric Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  Subject: Offlist note (fwd)
>>  Sender: Eric Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  To: "St.Auby Tamas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>  Dear Tamas,
>>
>>  I enjoyed immensly the reaction from your mail-friend in Oslo. Can I tell
>>  him that I know about it and how it pleased me?
>>
>>  All the bests
>>  Eric
>>  ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>  6.
>>
>>  Date:  28 Jul 2000
>>  To: Eric Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (St.Auby Tamas)
>>  Subject: Re: Offlist note (fwd)
>>
>>  High, dear Eric!
>>
>>  >Can I tell him that I know about it and how it pleased me?
>>
>>  Sure.
>>  Especially, because it's evident for him
>>  that you know about it.
>>
>>  I would accept with pleasure
>>  if you would tell him that
>>  Tamas St.Auby is a notorious liar,
>>  he is not an artist.,
>>  not even a non-art-artist.,
>>  but a monomaniac, boring bureaucrat,
>>  who thinks he is the only expert of Fluxus and all,
>>  who is an uncurable solipsist
>>  - or something like that.
>>
>>  Hugh!
>>
>>  aa
>>  ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>  7.
>>
>>  Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 16:59:26 +0200
>>  To: "St.Auby Tamas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  From: Ken Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  Subject: Please keep my private correspondence private if you wish to
>>   exchange email.
>>  Status: RO
>>  X-Status: A
>>
>>  Dear Tamas,
>>
>>  Why the hell did you involve me in correspondence with Eric Andersen?
>>
>>  Private correspondence ought to be private. Now you've started things up
>>  again.
>>  He doesn't like you any more than he likes me.
>>  (...)
>>  -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>  8.
>>
>>  Date:  3 Aug 2000
>>  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (St.Auby Tamas)
>>  Subject: Re: Please keep my private correspondence private if you wish to
>>  exchange email.
>>  Cc: Eric
>>
>>  High, dear Ken!
>>
>>  On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Ken Friedman wrote:
>  >
>>  > Private correspondence ought to be private.
>>
>>  I'm sorry, Ken,
>>  IPUT doesn't believe in the notion of private.
>>  If one shares anything
>>  it is immediately ought to be collective
>>  in the holy name of Techne.
>>  Noone should, can oblige IPUT to keep
>>  the shared in private.
>>  IPUT enjoys glasnost.y.
>>
>>  > He doesn't like you any more than he likes me.
>>
>>  Yes, we know.
>>  It's because Mr Andersen doesn't trust. anymore
>>  the secretary of IPUT,
>>  because she knew, but
>>  - althought she had some obscure love-st.ory with him
>>  while they met at a Landsbergis-party some years ago in Toscana)
>>  didn't tell to him what
>>  Szaraz Belshar wrote to Ben Vautier about him:
>>  >Eric Andersen is a notorious liar,
>>  >he is not an artist.,
>>  >not even a non-art-artist.,
>>  >but a monomaniac, boring bureaucrat, who
>>  >thinks he is the only expert of Fluxus and all,
>>  >who is an uncurable solipsist.(.)
>>  (Well, the laughter exploded when Vautier wrote it to Benjamin Patterson
>>  who then wrote it to Mr. Andersen who wrote back that
>>  it was him who wrote it first. to IPUT
>>  about himself
>>  who then wrote to Ms. Belshar
>>  - and all this happened during one afternoon
>>  between 5 countries .
>>  Did you hear that?)
>>  (...)
>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>  9.
>>
>>  Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:43:03 +0200
>>  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (St.Auby Tamas)
>>  From: Ken Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  Subject: Public forum.
>>
>>  Dear Tamas,
>>
>>  I don't agree with your idea of broadcasting private
>>  correspondence, but if you feel everything ought to
>>  be public, then go right ahead and publish what you
>>  want.
>>
>>  We can communicate via a public forum rather than
>>  through private notes.
>>
>>  Yours,
>>
>>  Ken
>>
>>  ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>  Since Ken unsubscribed from the FLUXLIST
>>  how can IPUT
>>  >communicate via a public forum rather than
>>  >through private notes
>>  ?
>>
>>  Hugh!
>>
>>  aa
>>
>>  #####################################

Reply via email to