1
2
3 unsu*scribe
4 unsu*scribe
5
6
7
8
9 unsu*scribe
10
11 unsubscribe
12 unsubscribe
13 unsubscribe
14 unsubscribe
15 unsubscribe
bah /\buns\w*b/i
> # administrivia [bool] (yes) <resend>
> # Look for administrative requests (e.g. subscribe/unsubscribe) and
> # forward them to the list maintainer instead of the list.
>administrivia = yes
you wrote:
>FYI, I recieved this email 4 freakin times, so if
>you are being censored its probably majordomo
>built in defenses against spam.
>
>Eric Andersen wrote:
>
>> This mail was sent to Fluxlist, Ken Friedman and me some hours ago.
>>
>> Why hasn't it appeared on the list???
>>
>> Ciao
>> Eric
>>
>> ##################################
>>
>> High!
>>
>> >Actually Ken has unsubscribed from Fluxlist.
>>
>> IPUT recalls the process:
>>
>> 1.
>>
>> On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Ken Friedman wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>> > Internet petitions do not work.
>> (...)
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> 2.
>>
>> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 19:42:04 +0200
>> From: "St.Auby Tamas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Fluxlist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: Internet petitions do not work
>>
>> High!
>>
>> On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Ken Friedman wrote:
>>
>> > Internet petitions do not work.
>>
>> Eric Andersen - after extensive research -
>> have informed me that
>> it was the internet petition more than anything else
>> that made the bureaucrats in Sao Paulo Bienal
>> realise the consequences, and
>> reconsider their decision concerning Ivo Mesquita.
>>
>> Hugh!
>>
>> aa
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> 3.
>>
>> (>Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 07:47:58 +0200
>> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >From: Ken Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Subject: Offlist note)
>>
>> (...)
>> >many of Eric's claims are also sheer fabrications and lies
>> (...)
>> ---------------
>>
>> 4.
>>
>> Since IPUT doesn't believe in the notion of private,
>> recieving the above "offlist note" by Ken Friedman
>> IPUT have forwarded it to Eric Andersen.
>> ---------------
>>
>> 5.
>>
>> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 15:24:10 -0400
>> From: Eric Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Offlist note (fwd)
>> Sender: Eric Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "St.Auby Tamas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> Dear Tamas,
>>
>> I enjoyed immensly the reaction from your mail-friend in Oslo. Can I tell
>> him that I know about it and how it pleased me?
>>
>> All the bests
>> Eric
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> 6.
>>
>> Date: 28 Jul 2000
>> To: Eric Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (St.Auby Tamas)
>> Subject: Re: Offlist note (fwd)
>>
>> High, dear Eric!
>>
>> >Can I tell him that I know about it and how it pleased me?
>>
>> Sure.
>> Especially, because it's evident for him
>> that you know about it.
>>
>> I would accept with pleasure
>> if you would tell him that
>> Tamas St.Auby is a notorious liar,
>> he is not an artist.,
>> not even a non-art-artist.,
>> but a monomaniac, boring bureaucrat,
>> who thinks he is the only expert of Fluxus and all,
>> who is an uncurable solipsist
>> - or something like that.
>>
>> Hugh!
>>
>> aa
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> 7.
>>
>> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 16:59:26 +0200
>> To: "St.Auby Tamas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> From: Ken Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Please keep my private correspondence private if you wish to
>> exchange email.
>> Status: RO
>> X-Status: A
>>
>> Dear Tamas,
>>
>> Why the hell did you involve me in correspondence with Eric Andersen?
>>
>> Private correspondence ought to be private. Now you've started things up
>> again.
>> He doesn't like you any more than he likes me.
>> (...)
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> 8.
>>
>> Date: 3 Aug 2000
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (St.Auby Tamas)
>> Subject: Re: Please keep my private correspondence private if you wish to
>> exchange email.
>> Cc: Eric
>>
>> High, dear Ken!
>>
>> On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Ken Friedman wrote:
> >
>> > Private correspondence ought to be private.
>>
>> I'm sorry, Ken,
>> IPUT doesn't believe in the notion of private.
>> If one shares anything
>> it is immediately ought to be collective
>> in the holy name of Techne.
>> Noone should, can oblige IPUT to keep
>> the shared in private.
>> IPUT enjoys glasnost.y.
>>
>> > He doesn't like you any more than he likes me.
>>
>> Yes, we know.
>> It's because Mr Andersen doesn't trust. anymore
>> the secretary of IPUT,
>> because she knew, but
>> - althought she had some obscure love-st.ory with him
>> while they met at a Landsbergis-party some years ago in Toscana)
>> didn't tell to him what
>> Szaraz Belshar wrote to Ben Vautier about him:
>> >Eric Andersen is a notorious liar,
>> >he is not an artist.,
>> >not even a non-art-artist.,
>> >but a monomaniac, boring bureaucrat, who
>> >thinks he is the only expert of Fluxus and all,
>> >who is an uncurable solipsist.(.)
>> (Well, the laughter exploded when Vautier wrote it to Benjamin Patterson
>> who then wrote it to Mr. Andersen who wrote back that
>> it was him who wrote it first. to IPUT
>> about himself
>> who then wrote to Ms. Belshar
>> - and all this happened during one afternoon
>> between 5 countries .
>> Did you hear that?)
>> (...)
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> 9.
>>
>> Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:43:03 +0200
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (St.Auby Tamas)
>> From: Ken Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Public forum.
>>
>> Dear Tamas,
>>
>> I don't agree with your idea of broadcasting private
>> correspondence, but if you feel everything ought to
>> be public, then go right ahead and publish what you
>> want.
>>
>> We can communicate via a public forum rather than
>> through private notes.
>>
>> Yours,
>>
>> Ken
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Since Ken unsubscribed from the FLUXLIST
>> how can IPUT
>> >communicate via a public forum rather than
>> >through private notes
>> ?
>>
>> Hugh!
>>
>> aa
>>
>> #####################################