i thought there was a policy in effect about using this list for flames and
personal vendettas. If there is in fact such a policy, you should boot eric
from the list. If there isn't, my advice for the list is to establish one.
and eric's tiresone droning about who is and who isn't an artist is yet
another unpleasant aspect of a theatrically unpleasant man. I got tricked in
to apologizing to eric when he lied about his part in this last in a series
of annual ugly farces. no more. I don't enormously care about the status of
FLUXUS as an art-historical category or a living church of vanity for its
dwindling corps of "real" members. I kind of like the people whose posts I
read in this list, and I like Ken. I don't feel the need here to enumerate
Ken's faults, who cares about them? The worst thing you can say bout him is
that he's irritatingly right some times, at excessive length. Eric, on the
other hand, is an asshole. Fine. Now you can boot me from the list, too. see
you,
Tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Andersen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 3:27 AM
> To: INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: Fluxlist, hmmmmmm.
>
> It is amazing how Sol and others thought they could rely on and base a
> Fluxlist on Ken Friedman, who is considered to be a complete farce by most
> artists ever associated with Fluxus.
>
> As Ben Patterson often puts is: If Ken Friedman didn't exist we would have
> to invent him.
>
> My advice for the list in the future: Try to establish some kind of
> understanding of whether Fluxus is anything whatsoever or something
> specific or both.
>
> Ciao
> Eric
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
