Dear Fluxers,

   I have to agree with Badgergirl. I've been following all the discussion 
about who is and who isn't Fluxus, who started it and who didn't, etc. I'm 
reminded of the wrangling between Richard Huelsenbeck and Tristan Tzara, when 
they were old men, about who came up with the name Dada! As if it matters. 
Dada and Fluxus for that matter are ways of thinking and creating, to my way 
of thinking! And, with anything & everything, I take what I like from this 
and that (Dada, Surrealism, Fluxus, Situationism, William Burroughs, etc.) 
and throw out what I don't like. Let's not get all carried away with 
following prescriptions and "toeing the line" of any one movement or artist. 
I find nothing more discouraging than contemporary artists foaming at the 
mouth in adoration of some cult figure artist(s) (like Beuys). Did I read 
recently about somebody fantasizing about making a "pilgrimage" to visit 
Beuys sites fer chrissakes?! We all have our sources of inspiration, for 
sure, but let's remember that our work here and now is what's really 
happening, or should be. What we're doing now had better be living and 
breathing. Now I will climb down off my soap box -- but carefully, because 
it's very tall.

   Hal McGee

   P.S. I recently found the Beuys book published by Barron's.

In a message dated 12/05/2000 7:48:38 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< Carol,
 Yeah, that's a great book! And I was in NYC at the time too but 
 unfortunately, I was too out of it (all fucked up in art school, ironically)
 back then to have been aware of those goings on. I'd also recommend (if you
 haven't already read 'em) the Beuys bio. by Heiner Stachelhaus published by
 Abbeville press, a small paperback life and works published (years ago) by
 Barron's, and The Felt Hat, Joseph Beuys a Life Told, by Lucrezia DeDomizio
 Durini published by Charta.  I've only just skimmed that last one, but
 there's not a lot published in English (nothing text heavy, anyway) so I
 rather grab anything that shows up.
 
 My, my, all these discussions of who's FLUXUS and who's not really, truly,
 FLUXUS.  Does it matter?  Should I care?  As long as the work
 produced...uh...you know...works, isn't that enough?  Clearly there were
 many overlapping themes in the work of Beuys, "genuine" Flux talent, and
 other artists who might not have actually met REAL flux artists but were
 clearly drawing from the same well.
 
 Don't ask if it's real, ask if it works.
 (then sign it, copy it, and send out documention--hee-hee)
 
 out of mind/out of time
 
 BadgerGirl
  >>

Reply via email to