> For Bertrand: Yes, Maciunas had many, many wonderful talents, but theory
>
> was certainly not one of them.Only Ben Vautier could find any interest in
Maciunas texts. The
> rest of us just went along because we considered them completely
> unimportant. We had our own opinions which differed a lot between us.

If Maciunas had so short views on avant garde and theory, why did so many
artists joined him around the Fluxus Network?
Were they cynical, e.g. using his ability to raise concerts and to organise
things, without finding any credibility in his conceptions?
Maybe Owen would help on this question.

Bertrand


Reply via email to