jason pierce wrote:
> {insert spit take}
what's a spit take?
> 20,000$ for a "sarkin"? there should be some kind of
> artistic code
> of ehtics in place that says no one can sell ANY piece of art work for more
> than say 1000$,
Why?
>
> and no one can buy or sell art work by people that are no longer living.
> throwing
> that much money around for art just corrupts and trivializes everything
> about it.
> the whole thing just reeks of arbitrary hierarcy. i mean suggesting that 1
> artists life
> or work is monetarily more signifigant than other artists' life?.....ok this
> is starting
> to sound like some kind of marxist aesthetic rant and i apologize but
> still.......
> the whole thing is just comical at best. it would be more interesting if
> sarkin never
> had a stroke and the whole context was fraudulent. i would like to suugest
> that
> artists should now only move about (fraudulently) in wheel chairs and wear
> aluminum
> foil on our heads in order to extract "the big bucks" from a sentimentally
> confused
> society.
Apparently, you are not a big fan of Chuck Close.
Best,
PK
>
>
> jason pierce
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
