Or maybe you could opt for a composite word. Elebit? Rabephant? ----- Original Message ----- From: Roger Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: FLUXLIST <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 23 February 2001 14:19 Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words > I was wondering > > is it possible to have identical words? > > although my ELEPHANT was in capitals > > maybe I should go back to rabbit > > this is so confusing > > > >
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Roger Stevens
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words wayfarers
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words { brad brace }
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Melissa McCarthy
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Julia Losonczi
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Cecil Touchon
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Roger Stevens
- RE: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Adam Lockett
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Roger Stevens
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words alan bowman
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words wayfarers
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Patricia
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words allen bukoff
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Carol Starr
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Terrence Kosick
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Aaron Kimberly
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words NeaL Johnson
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Roger Stevens
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Terrence Kosick
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Aaron Kimberly
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words alan bowman

