hi partricia and roger,
mindmatic, i like that, well said.
how can one possibly define something that has always been a part of the
package. for me it's like trying to define brown eyes which are also a part of
my package. it can never be explained to disect it would destroy the magic.
distinctions can be well drawn in a watercolour wash ;)
bests, carol :)
xooo
Patricia wrote:
>
> The very best tool is the mindmatic
> that each of us has as we all are artists in the fluxvein
> The mindmatic does not polemicize nor perorate
> The mindmatic is what is in us, as individuals
> It goes about its work, it has no need to define
>
> Making art is pulled from me by this tool
> and I don't want to explain it
> It changes every day, every minute, it has no definition
> What is art? I don't really give a shit. It just is.
> I do it.
>
> Duchamp said no work of art is finished until completed by
> the spectator
> Vostell said Duchamp has qualified the object into art. I
> have qualified life into art
> A college professor of mine said art is a snow fence
> Louise Nevelson said do your work
>
> Mindmatic
>
> And so it goes.
>
> PK
>
> Roger Stevens wrote:
>
> > I understand that
> > because
> > distinctions are very difficult to draw
> > you need a very soft pencil
> > or possibly
> > an air brush
> >
> > Roger
> >
> > >all that is created
> > >in my mind
> > >whether accidentally
> > >or on purpose
> > >is art
> > >
> > >i see no need for
> > >or benifit of
> > >drawing distinctions
> > >
--
carol starr
taos, new mexico, usa
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
