Fluxlisters,
I have attempted to reconstruct the entire thread of emails that St. Auby
Tamas submitted to Fluxlist to which I believe Eric Anderson refers (and is
copied below at the end of the string of Tamas emails).
An inquiry from Tamas about "who is the moderator of Fluxlist" led to an
off-list reply from Sol Nte (reported on by Tamas in the second email
below). In his reply, Nte informed Tamas that any email message submitted
to FLUXLIST that contains the words " G e n i u s 2 0 0 0" gets
automatically blocked by our list-serv software. Tamas then inquires "Who
did ban it?" and "Why the Fluxlisters are not useing
the tiptop tool of the net for Direct Democratic voting?" I believes this
second question is what Anderson is calling a proposal.
In a series of 6 emails Tamas then tests the software by successfully
submitting variations of the blocked phrase. [If this email message gets
through then I want " G e n i u s 2 0 0 0 " to be credited as test #7.]
Finally, Anderson responds saying "Great tests and proposal for maillist."
Then Owen Smith responded by saying he "seemed to have missed the original
reference - what was the proposal??"
Some confusion has ensued.
Allen B
>Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:23:26 +0200
>From: "St.Auby Tamas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: FLUXLIST: moderator
>
>
>High!
>
>IPUT would like to know
>who is the moderator of the Fluxlist.
>
>Thank you.
>
>Hugh!
>
>aa
>Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:44:14 +0200
>From: "St.Auby Tamas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: FLUXLIST: tests
>
>
>High, dear Fluxlisters!
>
>After sending by IPUT
>The Never Arriving Emil to the
>private emil-address of 69 FLuxlisters,
>on Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Sol Nte wrote
>to IPUT's private emil-address:
>
> > (...)
> > The only moderation done on a daily basis
> > is by the majordomo software.
> > The post I got from you mentioned "xxxxxx xxxx",
> > if you sent that to the list
> > it won't have got through because
> > if you remember we had to stop Max
> > spamming the list with way too much
> > "xxxxxx xxxx" stuff back in 1999.
> > (...)
>
>The "xxxxxx xxxx" = banned text on the Fluxlist.
>
>Who did ban it?
>
>Why the Fluxlisters are not useing
>the tiptop tool of the net
>for Direct Democratic voting?
>
>Hugh!
>
>aa
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:44:34 +0200
From: "St.Auby Tamas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FLUXLIST: test 1
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
High!
Genius
Hugh!
aa
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FLUXLIST: test 2
High!
2000
Hugh!
aa
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FLUXLIST: test 3
High!
enius 2000
Hugh!
aa
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FLUXLIST: test 4
High!
Genius 000
Hugh!
aa
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FLUXLIST: test 5
High!
Penius 2000
Hugh!
aa
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FLUXLIST: test 6
High!
Genius 2001
Hugh!
aa
>Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 20:46:46 +0200
>From: Eric Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: tests
>
>
>Dear Tamas,
>
>Great tests and proposal for maillist. Finally some spirit on the list.
>It is interesting to see how silent everybody becomes, when your voice
>is heard.
>
>You seem to scare the mice.
>
>All the bests,
>Eric
>Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 09:46:29 -0400
>Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: tests
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: "Owen Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >Dear Tamas,
> >
> >Great tests and proposal for maillist. Finally some spirit on the list.
> >It is interesting to see how silent everybody becomes, when your voice
> >is heard.
> >
> >You seem to scare the mice.
> >
> >All the bests,
> >Eric
> >
>
>Eric and/or Tamas - Somehow I seemed to have missed the original reference
>- what was the proposal??
>
>Owen
