No, this is kind of response is completely different from what happened at the original Flux festivals in Europe in 62 and 63. However it is extremely George Maciunas-like. To Allan Bukoff: There were virtually no ego fights between us. The whole thing was quite civilized. Later on things changed a bit but not really seriously. Eric Alex Cook wrote: > Is this what the original fluxus was like, people going back and forth on > protocols and what was said and/or recognized? > > I'm not being sarcastic, just curious > Alex > > >From: allen bukoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: FLUXLIST: The St. Auby Tamas' tests and proposal to which Eric > >Anderson referred? > >Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:06:06 -0700 > > > >Fluxlisters, > > > >I have attempted to reconstruct the entire thread of emails that St. Auby > >Tamas submitted to Fluxlist to which I believe Eric Anderson refers (and is > >copied below at the end of the string of Tamas emails). > > > >An inquiry from Tamas about "who is the moderator of Fluxlist" led to an > >off-list reply from Sol Nte (reported on by Tamas in the second email > >below). In his reply, Nte informed Tamas that any email message submitted > >to FLUXLIST that contains the words " G e n i u s 2 0 0 0" gets > >automatically blocked by our list-serv software. Tamas then inquires "Who > >did ban it?" and "Why the Fluxlisters are not useing > >the tiptop tool of the net for Direct Democratic voting?" I believes this > >second question is what Anderson is calling a proposal. > > > >In a series of 6 emails Tamas then tests the software by successfully > >submitting variations of the blocked phrase. [If this email message gets > >through then I want " G e n i u s 2 0 0 0 " to be credited as test #7.] > > > >Finally, Anderson responds saying "Great tests and proposal for maillist." > > > >Then Owen Smith responded by saying he "seemed to have missed the original > >reference - what was the proposal??" > > > >Some confusion has ensued. > > > >Allen B > > > > > > > > > >>Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:23:26 +0200 > >>From: "St.Auby Tamas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Subject: FLUXLIST: moderator > >> > >> > >>High! > >> > >>IPUT would like to know > >>who is the moderator of the Fluxlist. > >> > >>Thank you. > >> > >>Hugh! > >> > >>aa > > > > > > > > > >>Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:44:14 +0200 > >>From: "St.Auby Tamas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Subject: FLUXLIST: tests > >> > >> > >>High, dear Fluxlisters! > >> > >>After sending by IPUT > >>The Never Arriving Emil to the > >>private emil-address of 69 FLuxlisters, > >>on Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Sol Nte wrote > >>to IPUT's private emil-address: > >> > >> > (...) > >> > The only moderation done on a daily basis > >> > is by the majordomo software. > >> > The post I got from you mentioned "xxxxxx xxxx", > >> > if you sent that to the list > >> > it won't have got through because > >> > if you remember we had to stop Max > >> > spamming the list with way too much > >> > "xxxxxx xxxx" stuff back in 1999. > >> > (...) > >> > >>The "xxxxxx xxxx" = banned text on the Fluxlist. > >> > >>Who did ban it? > >> > >>Why the Fluxlisters are not useing > >>the tiptop tool of the net > >>for Direct Democratic voting? > >> > >>Hugh! > >> > >>aa > > > > > > > >Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:44:34 +0200 > >From: "St.Auby Tamas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: FLUXLIST: test 1 > >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > > >High! > > > >Genius > > > >Hugh! > > > >aa > > > > > > > > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: FLUXLIST: test 2 > > > >High! > > > >2000 > > > >Hugh! > > > >aa > > > > > > > > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: FLUXLIST: test 3 > > > >High! > > > >enius 2000 > > > >Hugh! > > > >aa > > > > > > > > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: FLUXLIST: test 4 > > > >High! > > > >Genius 000 > > > >Hugh! > > > >aa > > > > > > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: FLUXLIST: test 5 > > > > > >High! > > > >Penius 2000 > > > >Hugh! > > > >aa > > > > > > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: FLUXLIST: test 6 > > > > > >High! > > > >Genius 2001 > > > >Hugh! > > > >aa > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 20:46:46 +0200 > >>From: Eric Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: tests > >> > >> > >>Dear Tamas, > >> > >>Great tests and proposal for maillist. Finally some spirit on the list. > >>It is interesting to see how silent everybody becomes, when your voice > >>is heard. > >> > >>You seem to scare the mice. > >> > >>All the bests, > >>Eric > > > > > > > > > >>Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 09:46:29 -0400 > >>Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: tests > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>From: "Owen Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> >Dear Tamas, > >> > > >> >Great tests and proposal for maillist. Finally some spirit on the list. > >> >It is interesting to see how silent everybody becomes, when your voice > >> >is heard. > >> > > >> >You seem to scare the mice. > >> > > >> >All the bests, > >> >Eric > >> > > >> > >>Eric and/or Tamas - Somehow I seemed to have missed the original reference > >>- what was the proposal?? > >> > >>Owen > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
