Many of us are already well aware that:
>>>
>>> I, [Max Herman] have been on netime, Rhizome, and Fluxlist as a
>>> first rate pest. I, [Max Herman] tell you this in earnest not to
>>> brag about myself but to rather convince you that you stand a
>>> better chance to develop as a genius if your teacher is an evil
>>> web genius. ... I simply ask that you accept ... that I am a
>>> genius and you can learn to be a genius from me.
>>> Copyright � 1999 Max Herman, Genius
>>>
>>> I'm extremely guilty of the sin of pride. - Max Herman, Genius
>>> I think I'm the next Jesus Christ. - Max Herman, Genius
>>> I think I have the answer for humanity. - Max Herman, Genius
>>> I think that I understand love better than everybody else.
>>> - Max Herman, Genius
>>> If people would just listen to me and learn my wisdom, the world
>>> would be so good. - Max Herman, Genius
>>>
That's all I care to hear. If anyone wants to read more, go to the site
http://www.geocities.com/genius-2000/
and read as much of this as you want.
As far as I'm concerned, Max Herman is no John Cage. The roots of Fluxus are
anti-ego. That's the reason for casting dice. The G2K program has nothing to
do with Fluxus and it has no place on Fluxlist.
Tom Grothus
----------
>From: "narvis & ...pez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: test x
>Date: Fri, Jul 13, 2001, 8:25 PM
>
> a nostalgic event on-line
> called
>
> fluxtest x
>
> 1. go to your window
> & tell the world
> why genius-2000
> must become our "meshias"
> in no more than 5 seconds
> 5 words without pausas
>
> 2. take a pause
> came on back to computer
> & tell us what you did.
>
> (all fluxlisters are invited to do the job)
>
> ...p
>
>
>> De: Eric Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Responder a: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Fecha: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 02:20:24 +0200
>> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Asunto: Re: FLUXLIST: test x
>>
>> I entirely agree to it all / Eric
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "narvis & ...pez" wrote:
>>
>>> yeah!!
>>> vote for g-2000!!!!!!!!!
>>> he promised a fluxus-fluxlist-fluxsit-fluxist-flixits
>>> god-good comeback
>>> (without video copyrights)
>>>
>>> ...p
>>>
>>>> De: { brad brace } <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Responder a: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Fecha: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 15:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
>>>> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Asunto: Re: FLUXLIST: test x
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, narvis & ...pez wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> maybe we have an other genius 2000
>>>>> or similar god in campaing again?
>>>>
>>>> Well, if this was a _real Fluxist fluxlist, the (apparently)
>>>> one person banned (G-2000), would be the logical choice as
>>>> new (sole) list-owner.
>>>>
>>>> /:b
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
