"Often controversial, willing to argue with each other and with the common
view of art, Fluxus participants were diverse in goals and divergent in
viewpoint. The work was rooted in science and social practice as well as
in art, resolutely experimental, profoundly theoretical and often
didactic. These factors made Fluxus difficult to describe. Lacking a
common sensibility or a trademark style, Fluxus was overlooked by an art
market that defined the art history of recent decades. This situation has
changed. Historical studies now locate Fluxus as a primary source of
conceptual art, intermedia and performance art and Fluxus includes
founding figures of video art, installation, mail art and Internet.
Neglected by the market-oriented art world, Fluxus became a source of
ideas and practices adopted by fields ranging from architecture and
industrial design to culture theory and psychology."

Ken Friedman




Reply via email to