death, you're much more palatable without the overabundance of babycheekses. thank you, though you'll most likely take this 'opportunity' to ridicule me?
---- Original Message ---- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: Is There A Moderator In The House? Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:04:20 -0800 (PST) >On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, sean henry wrote: > >> >From: ben bracken >> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Subject: FLUXLIST: Is There A Moderator In The House? >> >Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 10:39:50 -0500 >> > >> >Dear Moderators, >> >Can you please do your job and moderate? There are some people on >> >this list that are flooding our screens with meaningless and >> >spiteful drivel. > > > Too bad there hasn't been any "meaningless and spiteful" drivel > besides in your own wishful misinterpretations of what is going on, > mostly because you are pissy. > > Then again, perhaps we should forward to the moderators your >private > mails in which you attempted to POSE as a moderator, with content > pseudo-official sounding and stating "please stop posting > to FLUXLIST, that's not what I subscribed to receive?" > Signed and titled, 'Moderator'? > > Not only that but you did an incredibly stupid job at it too? > And now that it doesn't work, you're going to try "public > complaints"? > > Do avoid projecting your own meaninglessness and spitefulness > on what we do. > > > >> This is ridiculous and has nothing to do with the >> >mission of the list. > > > Actually it is not_ ridiculous. And it does not matter how many > labels you wish to slap. As for the "mission of the list" > it's what you want to see in your mailbox. > > We suppose that the entire universe revolves around what "you want" > in your world, however that is not so. > > Passive-aggressive dictatorial behavior is definitely not lovely. > > >> Perhaps interested parties should get together >> >and make a new list where we don't have to deal with name calling >> >and off topic crap. > > Too bad there hasn't been any name calling or off topic "crap" > besides yours. Maybe you should try to sort out the very simple > understanding that things are not what your wishful projectionist > label slapping meaningless and spiteful idiocy "claims" that it is. > >
