maybe a little too structured for my taste... my attraction to the 1st box (from what i saw online) was the apparent randomness of the selections. varied like the different people on this list?
any thoughts? >i wonder if we could do a series of pieces over a period of time. >each edition of editions could contain pieces of a similar sort. > >for example - >edition1 - simple event texts >edition2 - drawings >edition3 - music based pieces (scores and / or recordings) >etc > >there could be a general theme for each, which should be open to >personal interpretation (obviously), and each participant should be >encouraged to attempt something outside of their usual discipline. >in this way everyone interested could participate in trying to >produce pieces in a range of disciplines/styles etc, >text/drwaing/painting/sound etc etc - and could interpret each in the >way they wished. e.g. a painters 'painting' may be iol on canvas, >yet a poet's painting may be something completely different yet >qualifying as a painting by its given definition. (are you with me ? > no? oh well!) > >with a series of collective 'semi-themed' (i.e all texts, all images >etc) the containers could be more specific and for want of a better >word 'obvious'. > >instructions on the classic index cards, drawings in a book, >electronic media could still be incorporated through cds, website >links also. > >just a thought > >cheers > >alan
