On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Bertrand Clavez wrote: > C'mon, Brad, don't get so much on clich�s...History of art is what you say, > and much worst sometimes, but it's also absolutely disinterested work and > true scholarship too (not to say how much it is necessary for anyone, and > first of all for the artists...)
well Bertrand, it's perhaps art-history's very blinkered "disinterest" in the face of ongoing and outright institutional abuse that's pretty hard to stomach... has there ever been a "radical art historian?" [Are they all essentially failed artists?] Pick a card, any card. /:b
