Some time ago, Josh sent something about the non-democratic aspects of Fluxus.
I've just found this quotation from an article of Ken Friedman (On FLuxus, by KF, Flash Art n� 84-85, Oct-Nov. 1978):
"Fluxus membership has grown by three processes: congregation, agglutination and linear transmission-roughly equivalent to some members agreeing to work together on one project or another at the beginning and at one ot two times since, several people joining those congregated for the project and remaining involved, and finally a process of disciples attaching to indivdual members as they have travelled and worked who later came into the Fluxus range by an unvoiced process akin to Apostolic succession. Fluxus has not been constitutional, but it has been democratic"
BTW, Don, later on, Ken is citing you also:
 "when one adds in individuals who have become members of the FLuxus circle in sociological sens, such as Edre Tot, John Armleder, DON BOYD, Tommy Mew, or Maurizio Nannucci (...)" and recalls your action in Fluxus-West as director, and the Contemporary Art/Southeast venture with Tommy Mew...Sounds like you had a great time, isn't it?
 
Bertrand
 

Reply via email to