In a message dated 3/31/04 9:20:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you have to at their stuff.
whut??
I think you are right but I find it problematic to the very idea (in my mind) of fluxus to be very beholdin to its history so much. What enriches you and your group perhaps intimidates others and in this lies the most core idea about fluxus:that it is a free _expression_. To care about the Codex or other fluxus writing so much risks a strict adherence. The idea for me is that it is the present and -not that it has nothing to do with the past-but I dont want to give to much care to what Joe Blow did in the sixties -you know. It makes me look over my shoulder and I don't want to do that. I appreciate what you all are doing by keeping aspects of historical fluxus alive but I have a different agenda. Dawg
- FLUXLIST: Fluxus in School secret fluxus
- Re: FLUXLIST: Fluxus in School ArtnAnts
- Re: FLUXLIST: Fluxus in School Ray Noman
- Re: FLUXLIST: Fluxus in School Sol Nte
- Re: FLUXLIST: Fluxus in School Ray Noman
- Re: FLUXLIST: Fluxus in School Sol Nte
- Re: FLUXLIST: Fluxus in School Bertrand Clavez
- Re: FLUXLIST: Fluxus in School ArtnAnts
- Re: FLUXLIST: Fluxus in School Ray Noman
- Re: FLUXLIST: Fluxus in School ArtnAnts
- Re: FLUXLIST: Fluxus in School ArtnAnts
- Re: FLUXLIST: MANY USES OF WHITE-OUT michael leigh

