Dear No Name Man,
I me changed my mine mind. Your voice(s) did sound like a royal we, <http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=the+royal+we>, therein the dissonance. You are now an I, and your we is striving toward more multifarious differentiation, but youse haven't always been so.
Without wax, Kathy
On Jul 12, 2004, at 2:30 PM, secret fluxus wrote:
Dear Kathy,
To answer Suse's letter, I wrote as an 'I' describing a 'we'. The 'we' is hardly royal. It's not even editorial I was more or less speaking of the eight of us, but writing as one who describes the thoughts and sentiments of eight.
Call me a lummox with the flummox.
On top of that, I am growing to like my non-de-plume nom-de-plume so much that I may keep it after the others grow names.
Sincerely,
The Man Without a Name
