Michael, Those stats only go up to 2002.
I wrote some software to analyse the archives which was how I came up with those. Unfortunately there is no easy way to repeat that analysis. I'd have to write new programs to do it. I don't know if I'd have time. I did that analysis for an article I wrote about Fluxlist that Owen and Ken were going to use. I did hear that it was finally going to be published but this was some months ago and I've not heard from Owen since so I assume it's not going to happen. Anyway, Michael if I do new stats you'll show up on those. Yes, it's only a core few that posted a lot, although I now post very rarely compared to say 1998/1999 when I posted a hell of a lot. But then again we all e-mail less these days. cheers, Sol. ----- Original Message ----- From: michael leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 7:44 PM Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: Hysterical At last on Fluxlist > > Fascinating statistics! I'm amazed that so few take an > active part in the list and its rather obviously who > take part too much! I didnt see myself anywhere so > must go back and see many times I posted( not that it > matters a jot!). > By the way the next issue of FLOSS will be the last > due to lack of interest from most people(I can see why > now) but mainly from me. So if you intended to send > some pages and have them on the back burner or > wherever it is you keep them, send them now of forever > hold your peas. > > Michael >
