Drill out all the tiny holes and make one big hole. Then go with the flow. Fluxus will (but might not) happen.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 1:41 PM To: [email protected] Subject: FLUXLIST: TIME: Accurate year of Nam June Paik's Zen for film 2 my dear friend Time, once a line is crossed it's hard to know if anything is true... hi everyone. i've been scared to talk to youall for a while because i'm constantly dreaming and that can frighten human/ robots---but i'm trying to write a story and make a map for today's young minds--....i don't know much about the past but learning. last time i did research I had the same problem---wherer the f-*C*-is the valid info? there are little tiny holes everywhere.... *C* starlite On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:29:23 -0500 Reid Wood wrote: > In The Worlds of Nam June Paik by John G. Hanhardt, the catalogue > from the Paik retrospective at the Guggenheim Museum, the following > caption appears on page 75: > > Zen for Film, 1964, performed as part of New Cinema Festival I, > Filmakers' Cinemateque, New York, November 2, 1965. > > I don't know if (or where) it was performed in 1964. > > On Dec 8, 2005, at 4:55 AM, Vai Becker Jason Steve wrote: > > > Dear All, > > Hello, I'm currently doing a presentation about Fluxus > > (mainly Nam June Paik) and is now making a chronology of Paik's works, > > however when I search the internet for the release year of "Zen for > > film", it > > comes up with various years i.e. 1962, 1964, 1965 and particulary > > "1962 > > - 64" which I don't understand at all. > > I would kindly like your expertise answer about the correct > > year. Thanks a lot! > > > > > > regards, > > Ryan > > _______________________________________ > > è?©ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ - Yahoo! Messenger > > 憩呾斕�衄奻鋒ㄛ斕腔攬è¡-�è?«çœ•és<caron>±ç‹Ÿï¿½ï¿½â…?oæ–•ã„› > > ��蓖ç‹S<caron>W�憩å?”蕾撈艘善ㄛ�ç?¡æŒ2����軗囮〔 > > http://messenger.yahoo.com.hk >
