Cecil, How can you suppose to know what "something worth hanging up on a wall" is? Who put you (or anybody - not just you, but me, or Alan, or any of us) in charge of making the decision about what is "worth looking at"? Nothing looks pretty good on many walls.
I like the things on my walls. In all honesty I would feel honoured to have the things that you make on my walls too. But that's not the point. I think it is much more challenging to think about nothing. The world has enough stuff to go around. Why should I add more? Allan -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cecil Touchon Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 11:36 PM To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com Subject: FLUXLIST: Something and something well made at that I say, dear Alan, I haven't the foggiest notion as to what your talking about. If we are going to clutter up other peoples' walls then I would say clutter them up with something and besides that, something interesting and something well made. Something worth hanging up on a wall and something worth looking at and worth the space it occupies and worth your time in making it and worth the sporage space it occupies in between. Cecil, new collages on view at http://cecil.touchon.com alan bowman wrote: > Have we not had nothing crop up on fluxlist before? > Perhaps we are all jus good for nothings > > but... > > does the act of posting an email entitled 'nothing', even if the body > of the > mail is empty, not constitute as something? > > i propose that we that we all make a concerted effort to forget nothing. > only when it is truly forgotten by all of us will it be 'nothing'. > > > > > >
