Hi Scott, On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 13:48 -0700, Scott wrote: > Well - since you asked (but this is truly a nit, since it's consistent) > > The matrix derived from Quaternion rotation is backwards with respect > to ones computed by the rotate(). One reason could be that the Matrix > constructor that takes 16 values looks like it's col-major order. I > think this is just in the quat-to-matrix code.
Looks good to me, I've transposed the matrix in dQuat::toMatrix() and they match now. As as it's 'break compatibility week' - feel free to commit stuff like this btw :) cheers, dave
