Dave Griffiths <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 19:03 +0200, gabor papp wrote: >> hi Dave, >> >> > I've added some flags to the build to allow fluxus to be built with >> > the binary modules embedded. This is mainly to help out with >> > packaging >> great! thanks. Second that great! >> >> i'm looking at the modifications checking the similarities with >> the osx application, and noticed that you included only a few modules. >> don't we require scheme/pretty, scheme/class, and frtime also? i would >> also include ffi, so the users could use scheme bindings for binary >> dynamic libraries. > > Simply because I was trying to find out the bare minimum (and get rid of > some dependencies - eg srfi replaced by a one line function) Feel free > to add these... > > Heres a static everything binary, I've just tested it on a clean install > of ubuntu hardy, and it 'just works' without installing anything: > http://www.pawfal.org/fluxus/files/fluxus-0.16-hardy-bin.tar.gz
So cool, it even worked on a netbook here with a geode video :)(of course far from fast cause of hardware but it works and just out of the box), I feel the sorry for those newcomers not having to compile fluxus themselves :). > > This feels a bit dirty on linux though, and I've been looking at debian > packages as well today, looking at Artem's files in the launchpad bzr > repo. Is there any reason we shouldn't have these files (the debian > subfolder, and the equivalent on other distros) in git? > No reason i think. > Ubuntu wise, it looks like jaunty and karmic include plt 4.1.3 at the > moment, so we might not need to worry so much about static linking > against mzscheme - but it is nice to be able to have control over the > version we use. > > cheers, > > dave cheers, glauber
