> > Come on, that's exactly what you would want to make your shows more > accessible, right? If I could get everyone (the non-coders) in the room to > really think about SSOT for one minute, it would be a good day. > > What I suppose I meant is that we could do essentially anything yet that leaves questions about what is (or should be) a part of the editor and what would be individual expression. I have to say that I have a lot more wild ideas than solid ideas about what makes a coherent, basic editor that would still leave space for extension and experimentation.
But yes; I agree. I do suspect there is a lot of chance here for making code-editing and code structure engaging (and silliness). > (/me vanishes again) > > Why? It's fun. Come play outside, there's a new sort of playground. We need swings, roundabouts, rollercoasters in dynamically amounts of dimensions and kids of all ages. ;-) Yours, Kas.
