On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:32:12AM +0200, Christoph Kummerer wrote: > maybe, but keep in mind with geiser for example the problem seems > to be some racket code that geiser loads before drflux. >
Well, if I somehow can't build Fluxus against 5.2.1 I'll just go back to 5.1 I find it hard to imagine that cli racket would pre-run more code than a application like drracket. > > wihtout having it thouroughly tested it looks like most things are > indeed working, one annoying issue I ran into is that racket has it's > own (time) function that isn't playing nicely with fluxus. You might get more out or (time-now), that one also plays nicely with (spawn-task ) and with Fluxa and for other applications like comparing for time passed and sines and the like it's just as good, just a bit longer to type. Yours, Kas.
