hi Claude,
I had a link error with racket that said I needed to recompile something
within racket with -fPIC to make useable from a shared object, and I thought
static compile of fluxus would be easier than rebuilding racket with -fPIC
added somewhere.
this seems to be an error that the racket developers can answer.
Probably! Or even putting each symbol in a different C++ namespace might do
the trick?
yes, that would do it. or what is even simpler, i think making them static
would also work. they don't have to be exported i believe.
best,
gabor